touch-packages team mailing list archive

1. touch-packages team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the touch-packages mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 1284744] Re: my system is running slowly, (continued)
  • [Bug 1284744] Re: my system is running slowly
    From: Christopher M. Penalver, 2015-02-15
• [Bug 1325267] Re: App icons slide up under the header on mako #57
  From: Albert Astals Cid, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Walker Gusmão, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-25
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-25
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Bruno Nova, 2014-08-27
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Marc Deslauriers, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Marc Deslauriers, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-08
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-08
• [Bug 1349387] Re: server settings are inaccessible
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-08
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Robert Ancell, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Robert Ancell, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-09-12
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-09-12
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-12
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Robert Ancell, 2014-09-17
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Robert Ancell, 2014-09-17
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Brian Murray, 2014-09-18
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-09-22
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Chris J Arges, 2014-09-23
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-23
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-09-24
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-30
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-10-15
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-10-15
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2014-11-15
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-11-18
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-12-10
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2014-12-10
• [Bug 1359332] Re: Need to allow for both Unity 8 desktop "bare metal" and LXC sessions
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2015-09-18
• [Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
  From: Hugo, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
  From: Charles Cazabon, 2014-11-05
• [Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
  From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-11-19
• [Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
  From: Jackson Doak, 2014-12-14
• [Bug 1218228] Re: Please update to openjpeg-2.0.0
  From: Robert Ancell, 2015-07-01
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: James, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-06-12
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-07-02
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Dimitri John Ledkov, 2015-07-02
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2015-07-14
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-07-17
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-07-17
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-07-20
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2015-07-24
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Reik Keutterling, 2015-08-03
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Chris J Arges, 2015-08-06
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Chris J Arges, 2015-08-06
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Chris J Arges, 2015-08-06
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-08-07
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Hua Zhang, 2015-08-07
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Martin Pitt, 2015-09-01
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Steve Langasek, 2015-09-01
• Re: [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Martin Pitt, 2015-09-02
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Steve Langasek, 2015-09-01
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Steve Langasek, 2015-09-02
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Martin Pitt, 2015-09-02
• Re: [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Steve Langasek, 2015-09-02
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Martin Pitt, 2015-09-03
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Robie Basak, 2015-09-03
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Martin Pitt, 2015-10-20
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Steve Langasek, 2015-10-20
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2015-10-20
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Simon Déziel, 2015-10-20
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2015-10-21
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2015-10-27
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Mark Stosberg, 2015-12-03
• Re: [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Dimitri John Ledkov, 2015-12-03
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Simon Déziel, 2015-12-03
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2015-12-04
• [Bug 1273462] Re: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2016-01-20
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Olga Kemmet, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Giorgio Venturi, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Giorgio Venturi, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Giorgio Venturi, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Bill Filler, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Bill Filler, 2014-09-09
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho, 2014-09-10
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-11
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-11
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Bill Filler, 2014-09-12
• [Bug 1359353] Re: [browser] Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Giorgio Venturi, 2014-09-16
• [Bug 1332798] Re: too much https traffic towards 91.189.92.55 (daisy.ubuntu.com)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1256561] Re: starting mathematica 9 crashes xserver
  From: Jhon Gonzalez, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1291278] Re: Lightdm should wait until network is ready or time out
  From: bog, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1291278] Re: Lightdm should wait until network is ready or time out
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-11-30
• [Bug 1291278] Re: Lightdm should wait until network is ready or time out
  From: Sasa Paporovic, 2015-09-04
• [Bug 1320563] Re: invoke-rc.d: initscript systemd-logind, action "start" failed.
  From: PowerKiKi, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1320563] Re: invoke-rc.d: initscript systemd-logind, action "start" failed.
  From: Rob Frohne, 2014-09-10
• [Bug 1320563] Re: invoke-rc.d: initscript systemd-logind, action "start" failed.
  From: Iain Cuthbertson, 2014-09-12
• [Bug 1320563] Re: invoke-rc.d: initscript systemd-logind, action "start" failed.
  From: Jori Gel, 2015-05-28
• [Bug 1320973] Re: it should be possible to override the is_paid_data_plan check
  From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1320973] Re: it should be possible to override the is_paid_data_plan check
  From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1320973] Re: it should be possible to override the is_paid_data_plan check
  From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1320973] Re: it should be possible to override the is_paid_data_plan check
  From: Matthew Paul Thomas, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1306330] Re: Custom proxy classes don't inherit special Qt abilities
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1306330] Re: Custom proxy classes don't inherit special Qt abilities
  From: Christopher Lee, 2015-03-05
• [Bug 1348399] Re: Autopilot does not honor the object cache when creating the root introspection object
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1348399] Re: Autopilot does not honor the object cache when creating the root introspection object
  From: Christopher Lee, 2014-08-24
• [Bug 1359382] Re: colord rejects printer .ICC color profile
  From: Monsta, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1359382] Re: colord rejects printer .ICC color profile
  From: Oliver K, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359382] [NEW] colord rejects printer .ICC color profile
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Björn Michaelsen, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-09-06
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: cleary, 2014-09-25
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: cleary, 2014-10-02
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2014-10-03
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2014-11-07
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: zigi, 2014-11-22
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-11-24
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Murz, 2014-11-25
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: cleary, 2014-11-26
• [Bug 1359486] Re: [PPA] "Use LibreOffice Dialogs" setting is ignored in KDE
  From: Mark, 2014-11-26
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Hélio Nunes, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: rpkrawczyk, 2015-02-23
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: HaraldK, 2015-02-28
• Re: [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Rafael Nonato, 2015-02-28
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Uriel Tunz, 2015-03-01
• Re: [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Rafael Nonato, 2015-03-01
• Re: [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Uriel Tunz, 2015-03-01
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: HaraldK, 2015-03-01
• Re: [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Rafael Nonato, 2015-03-01
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Rafael Nonato, 2015-03-01
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Herwig Hochleitner, 2015-03-31
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Jonathan Harker, 2015-04-23
• Re: [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: Rafael Nonato, 2015-04-23
• [Bug 1243642] Re: .Xmodmap not automatically loaded on start
  From: pablomme, 2015-10-31
• [Bug 1293144] Update Released
  From: Scott Kitterman, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1350356] Re: [needs-packaging] vlc 2.1.5 is released, software upgrade is needed
  From: Brian Murray, 2014-08-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1350356] Re: [needs-packaging] vlc 2.1.5 is released, software upgrade is needed
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-02-06
• [Bug 1350356] Re: [needs-packaging] vlc 2.1.5 is released, software upgrade is needed
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-02-06
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Arto Jalkanen, 2014-08-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: 1proton, 2014-12-17
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Franko Burolo, 2014-12-17
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-02-21
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-02-21
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-02-21
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Franko Burolo, 2015-02-21
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Amr Ibrahim, 2015-05-23
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2015-06-03
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: TomasHnyk, 2015-06-03
• [Bug 1165420] Re: Unable to access indicators from HUD
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2015-11-25
• [Bug 1359353] Re: Top sites visuals could be improved
  From: Bill Filler, 2014-08-20
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Joseph Salisbury, 2014-08-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-20
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-21
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-22
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-27
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-27
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-08-27
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Joseph Salisbury, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Joseph Salisbury, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Christopher Townsend, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-28
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-08-29
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-29
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Joseph Salisbury, 2014-08-29
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-29
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-08-29
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-30
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-30
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-08-31
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Treviño, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Alan Fry, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-01
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Alan Fry, 2014-09-02
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-04
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-04
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Joseph Salisbury, 2014-09-05
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-05
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: Alan Fry, 2014-09-05
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-05
• [Bug 1359299] Re: utopic 3.16.0-9 iso boots to desktop no unity
  From: jerrylamos, 2014-09-10

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2016 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  System status