ubuntu-advertising team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

anti Linux and Not supported example

To: ubuntu-advertising@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: alan c <aeclist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:40:05 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7

Just seen this item, an example of not supported actually meaning notallowed


=============================================
AT&T Blocks Linux Configuration
http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/2010/12/at-blocks-linux-configuration.html

"...the unofficial grumblings I got from the AT&T phone reps are thatonly pirates use Linux. If that's the case, then this is very likely ahigh up, corporate wide decision and you are going to need to go highup the food chain to reach anyone with any ability to adjust policy."

=============================================


and
==========================================
Bank of America Rep Responds To No Linux Support
http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/
==========================================

food for thought at least?

--
alan cocks
Ubuntu user