ubuntu-appstore-developers team mailing list archive

[Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/22/2014 02:11 PM, Pat McGowan wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 12:48 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>> * when adding a framework, we need to understand what a microversion means if
>>    we are going to use it. Ie, in terms of apparmor policy, is there a
>>    difference between ubuntu-14.04-qml and ubuntu-14.04.1-qml such that
>>    "ubuntu-14.04-qml, ubuntu-14.04.1-qml" is supposed to be supported in the
>>    click manifest?
> Yes, we had discussed the idea of a minor version which adds APIs to a
> base framework revision. But I think we could stipulate a single
> apparmor policy for these.

Cool, agreed.

>>  * click-review-tools needs to be adjusted to enforce the outcomes of this
>>    thread
>>
>> With the above, an app developer then has a choice of either uploading
>> differently versioned apps with different framework bases to the the store or
>> declaring the earliest (supported) framework desired for the app.
>>
>> As an aside, I'd like to see the outcomes of this codified somewhere so that the
>> SDK, foundations/phonedations, security, community and app store teams are all
>> on the same page and to ensure adding a new framework works correctly.
> I started a document to record this and will share.
> 
Awesome, thanks! Is this ready for a wider audience yet? Alexander suggested in
a later message to the thread some rules for defining frameworks that can be
added (and once its codified, I can adjust click-apparmor and the review tools).


-- 
Jamie Strandboge                 http://www.ubuntu.com/