ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[HggdH <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:53:17 -0700
> Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for your interest in joining the Ubuntu Bug Control team.  As
> > part of the application process we need to ensure that the following
> > criteria are met.
> > 
> > 1) Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to
> > you or Ubuntu?  
> 
> 	Yes
> 
> > Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
> 
>       Yes, launchpad name used is  charlie-tca
> 
> > 2) Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage[0], Bugs/Assignment[1] and
> > Bugs/Importance[2] at wiki.ubuntu.com?  Do you have any questions about
> > that documentation?
> 
> 	Yes, I read the pages.
> 	No, I have no questions at this time, although I seem to ask on
> #ubuntu-bugs as they come up.
> 
> > 3) What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash
> > report bug before making it public?  See Bugs/HowToTriage[1] for more
> > information.
> 
>       Check for CoreDump.gz; if still attached look at the stack trace
> to see if it contains enough information. If there is enough
> information, remove the CoreDump.gz attachment. 
> 	Check the Stacktrace.txt for anything that looks like
> sensivitive information passed as function arguments, including bank
> account numbers, passwords, etc.
> 
> > 4) Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are
> > interested in helping out with?
> 
>       Xubuntu team packages
> 
> > 5) I also need to see a list of five or more bugs which you have
> > triaged.  These bugs should demonstrate your understanding of the triage
> > process and how to properly handle bugs.  If there is a bug in your list
> > that does not have an importance indicate what importance you would give
> > it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control.  Please use urls in
> > your list of bugs so I can more easily find them.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-places-plugin/+bug/271689
>     Confirmed apport bug
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/254655
>     Confirmed and forwarded upstream

This one ended up not being a bug. The final status should not have been
"Fix Released" -- since there was no fix --, but "Invalid". I corrected
it. Otherwise, good work! 
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar-volman/+bug/220987
>     Confirmed and found upstream; linked to upstream bug

Good work. I set Importance to LOW.

Also, it might be a good idea to document the workaround (see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Description). I have added it in. 
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/231923
>     confirmed; importance should be medium

a test case and the packages versions should have been added. Otherwise
good work.

> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/220780
>     sent to translation team; importance should have been low

Good work. All that is left if verify if it is already released, and
mark it so. I cannot do that, since my Hebrew is almost null. 

(snip)

The other bugs are similar.

I have seen, and interacted with Charlie on #ubuntu-bugs, and consider
him a good fit. +1.

I wish more of us would be using the improved description (as linked
above). It *does* help, since the most critical data will be at the
beginning of the bug report.

..hggdh..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part