ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 08:22:06AM +0530, Arky wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> Thank you for reviewing my application.
> --- On Mon, 7/9/09, Scott Howard <showard314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >   5. Please list five or more bugs
> > which you have triaged. These bugs should demonstrate your
> > understanding of the triage process and how to properly
> > handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not
> > have an importance indicate what importance you would give
> > it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use
> > urls in your list of bugs.
> > 
> 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/424804
> Importance: Medium

This looks great, thanks for taking the time to forward this upstream
and adding a bug watch.  I agree with the importance of Low that the bug
report has because it is one that can be easily worked around.  
 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/412476
> Importance: Low

Thanks for adding a patch to the bug report!  However, I don't see any
actual triaging work done on this bug report.  I do agree with an
importance of Low though.
 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-orca/+bug/343712
> Importance: Low

Thanks for taking the time to forward this upstream and adding the bug
watch this is quite valuable.  It seems that the bug report could use
some cleanup now though.  I think the gnome-orca bug task can be
Invalid, a new task added for openoffice.org in Ubuntu and a bug watch
for the openoffice bug report mentioned in the upstream bug added.
However, the work you did of forwarding this upstream was very valuable
as it ended up in the bug being resolved!  I agree with a Low importance
here.
 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/module-init-tools/+bug/411534
> Importance: Low

This looks fine, however the wrong sponsors team is subscribed to the
bug report as the package is in main not universe.  It might also be
worthwhile to forward this bug report and patch to Debian if they also
have the bug.  I agree with a Low importance.
 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/envyng-core/+bug/411915
> Importance: Low 

Thanks again for adding a patch to this bug report, however the triaging
work isn't particularly interesting.  Again I agree with an importance
of Low.
 
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemulator/+bug/348718
> Importance: Low

Your work on the Ubuntu bug seems fine and thanks for forwarding the
patch upstream.  However, it looks like you might have used
submittodebian to send the patch upstream.  I'm not certain this was
entirely correct since the patch you were forwarding has not be included
in an Ubuntu package, but thanks for sending it to them!  Low again
seems correct.

Based on the quality of your work I'm happy to approve your membership
in the Bug Control team.  Congratulations and welcome!

Sincerely, 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature