ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 14.05.2010 16:58, Lorenzo De Liso wrote:
>> 5. Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs 
>> should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to
>> properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not 
>> have an importance indicate what importance you would give it after 
>> becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use urls in your list
>> of bugs. 
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvipsk-ja/+bug/570858 (I'd
> give the importance "medium" because it has a moderate impact, since it
> isn't installable).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/570879 (I'd give the importance "medium" because the program could not be used properly).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/570836 (I'd give
> the importance "low" because it can be easily fixed and is a low-impact
> bug).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/571257 (I'd give
> the importance "medium" if the reporter will report more information
> about the bug -  because gedit can't be used for read the created files
> and that's a significant impact).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/571300 (I'd
> give the importance "low" becuase it has a low-impact and the
> application can be used with it).

Lorenzo asked me to follow up on this email. Although I can't comment
extensively, I'd like to mention that we recently added him to the
ubuntu-reviewers team and although I just reviewed a very few bugs I was
quite happy with what he'd done there.

Have a great day,
 Daniel