ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[C de-Avillez <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:30 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> 	• Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
> 
> I promise. :)
> 
> 	• Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation?
> 
> I have. No questions.
> 
> 	• What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more information.
> 
> CoreDump.gz must always be removed. Stacktrace.txt should be inspected
>  for sensitive information.
> 
> 	• Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are
>  interested in helping out with?
> 
> As a member of the Canonical Platform Server Development Team I'm
>  particularly interested in helping to triage the server-team bugs.
> 
> 	• Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs
>  should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to
>  properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not
>  have an importance indicate what importance (and explain the
>  reasoning) you would give it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug
>  Control. Please use urls in your list of bugs.
> 
> Here is a list of bugs i've triaged recently:
> 
> Confirmed + forwarded upstream:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdparm/+bug/590129
> Importance should be "Low" - This is just a documentation fix.

Agree, marked the bug Triaged/Low.

> Reported upstream + patched (Status=>Confirmed):
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/591475 Importance should be
>  "Medium" - LVM2 is a core application and users spend an inordinate
>  amount of time confirming that their disks are not broken.

Also agree, and I marked the bug Triaged/Medium.

> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/+bug/491685
>  Importance should be "Low" - This does not affect most servers, and
>  will only annoy users mildly.

Agreed. Mathias had already marked the bug Triaged/Low, anyways. BTW,
there is a comment from him for you.

> Marked as duplicate:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/590309
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/541077

Correctly so.

> Marked as incomplete:
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/+bug/590399
>  Importance should stay at Undecided until bug report is reproducible
>  as it is not clear what the impact is.

For the Server team, we have a policy to assign an Importance as soon as
possible. If, later on, progress on the bug suggests an adjustment on
Importance, we are free to do so.

As such, I am marking it Low -- we do not have data to fully analyse
impact. As an aside, this seems to be a FTBFS (on whatever version the
error happened). 

> Confirmed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/592442
>  Importance should be "Medium" as there seems to be no work around for
>  the issue if a server is incompatible.

Agreed.
> 
> Fix Released:
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/419091
>  Importance should be Medium - All couchdb users in Karmic are affected
>  by this, so it will be nominated for SRU.

Agreed.

All in all, good work. I specially like the upstreaming, BTW.

+1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part