ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:05:30AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Brian Murray (brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > > # Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs should
> > > demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle
> > > bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not have an importance indicate
> > > what importance (and explain the reasoning) you would give it after becoming a
> > > member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use urls in your list of bugs. 
> > > 
> > > 	https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/597510
> > > 		I would have placed this one at low priority, as it
> > > 		was not really a bug.
> > 
> > This seems fine and I'd agree with a low priority here.  You might also
> > look at http://launchpad.net/bugs/581959 as it is an apport-package bug
> > report with the same exit status.
> 
> Interesting - and that one itself may be a dupe :)  This one now
> actually appears to be a dual bug - the original error was in the
> environment, while the new one appears to be a configuration error.
> 
> > > 	https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/588293
> > 
> > I'd modify the title of this bug report to be very specific as it is
> > likely to draw comments about the same symptom with different root
> > causes.  Additionally, someone may end up reopening it after it is fixed
> > when they see a memory leak in qemu-kvm.  I really appreciate the
> > verbosity of your comments in this bug report and documenting tests.
> 
> Good idea, hadn't considered that - thanks.
> 
> > > 	https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/595427
> > > 		I'd place this at low priority, because it can be
> > > 		worked around (by installing the distro).
> > 
> > I'd disagree with the priority for this particular bug as getting people
> > to test Ubuntu, which testdrive is one way to do, is very important
> 
> That makes sense.  I'd considered thinking along those lines at first,
> but decided you needed ubuntu to run testdrive in the first place.  But
> of course testing iso's is also important.
> 
> > additionally system lock ups like this should be a high priority.  I
> > wonder if this is a problem on real hardware.
> 
> (I haven't been able to reproduce it on hw.)

That sounds like something worth noting in the bug report so that
information is available to everyone.
 
-- 
Brian Murray

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature