ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[C de-Avillez <carlos.de.avillez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/15/2011 08:42 AM, Julian Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
> I was urged in #ubuntu-motu to apply for bug control so I don't have to
> always ask others modify bugs :)
>

Yeah, I can pretty much see why :-)

>> Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to
> you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
>
> I promise to be polite to bug reporters and I have read and signed the
> Ubuntu Code of Conduct:
> https://launchpad.net/~jtaylor/+codesofconduct
>
>> Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and
> Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation?
>
> yes I have read and understood them.
>
>> What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash
> report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more
> information.
>
> private information, passwords, telefon numbers, adresses etc.

And the ubiquitous coredump... which will probably have all of the
above, plus my mother's address. ;-)

>> Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are
> interested in helping out with?
>
> I am especially interested in python and mono based packages and also
> have a lot of experience in triaging and fixing gcc based FTBS bugs.
>
>> Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and
> include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs
> should be representative of your very best work and they should
> demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly
> handle bugs. For all the bugs in the list, please indicate what
> importance you would give it and explain the reasoning. Please use urls
> in your list of bugs.
>
> tracing bug back to source (starting from playonlinux), marking
> duplicates, forwarded upstream:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/824734
> importance high: affects many users of core application
>
> SRU bug in one of my debian packages:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/foolscap/+bug/782414
> importance medium, as it has severe impact on a non-core application
> (tahoe-lafs fails to start)
>
> two similar SRU bugs, forwarded to debian
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyfltk/+bug/779340
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/soya/+bug/780305
> importance high: renders package unusable
>
> getting missing information from bug reporter, confirm and forward
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/meld/+bug/794210
> importance low: unlike affects a unlikely edge cas
>
> checking upstream version, identify commit, prepare SRU
> SRU was canceled due to similar bug discovered, but turned out to be
> unrelated, will finish SRU when meld 1.5.2 lands in oneiric (FFe will be
> requested for that)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meld/+bug/774265
> importance medium: affects several users, very annoying bug
>

All in all, good work. I particularly like the upstreaming.
Certainly, a

+1

is warranted.


> Best Regards,
> Julian Taylor
>

Cheers. Thank you for helping.

..C..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature