ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[C de-Avillez <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

(forwarding to Brandon, given that he is not subscribed to the ML.)

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:29:28 -0700
Matt Fischer <matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/27/2013 04:00 PM, Brandon Schaefer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My name is Brandon Schaefer, and Im applying for membership into
> > the ~ubuntu-bugcontrol team.
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/~brandontschaefer
> >
> > - Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are
> > rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
> >
> > Yes, and I have signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct.
> >
> > - Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and 
> > Bugs/Importance? Do you have any questions about that documentation?
> >
> > Yes I have read through them, and most questions have been
> > answered :).
> >
> > - What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash 
> > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage for more 
> > information.
> >
> > Make sure the CoreDump.gz is removed before making it public.
> >
> > Checking any of the Stacktraces.txt/ThreadStacktraces.txt for any 
> > strings containing private information (passwords, user names, etc.)
> >
> > - Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are 
> > interested in helping out with?
> >
> > lp:unity
> > lp:compiz
> > lp:nux
> >
> > Lots of bugs in those packages :).
> >
> > - Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and 
> > include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these
> > bugs should be representative of your very best work and they
> > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how
> > to properly handle bugs. For all the bugs in the list, please
> > indicate what importance you would give it and explain the
> > reasoning. Please use urls in your list of bugs.
> 
> Some of these bugs lack enough detail I think to be considered
> triaged. Specifically, 961783, 1061939 don't list Ubuntu version or
> software version which would make it hard for someone to start on, in
> my opinion. Was there any reason for leaving that off?

Same question as Matt. Additionally, bugs opened by you are not good
examples of *triaging* work.

> >
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1086988
> > High, because users were unable to use their application.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1125351
> > High at first, but moved to a medium because it is a usability
> > issue but doesn't cause serious problems with the core of the
> > application.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1112044
> > Medium because it is a usability issue, but wont make the program 
> > unusable.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1109150
> > Medium because it was a regression of an expected behavior,
> > otherwise this would be low importance.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/autopilot/+bug/1061939
> > Medium because the bug causes misleading information, which causes 
> > impact on the overall application.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/961783
> > Medium because its a big usability problem, but doesn't cause any 
> > serious problems with the core application.
> > Hopefully I haven't missed anything! If not let me know.
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature