Hi there, Alberto!
One of the things you'll need is patience, we're all busy working
on bugs and such in preparation for the release of Raring later
this month.
I have a couple of concerns of the bugs you've selected to
display as examples of your work.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella
<es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
El 22/03/13 05:52, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió:
Here is my application:
1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they
are rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code
of Conduct?
Yes, I promise: I signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct years
ago, and read it recently.
2. Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>, Bugs/Assignment
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, Bugs/Status
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> and Bugs/Importance
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have any
questions about that documentation?
I have been an active member of Launchpad since 2007
and, since then, the only operating system I have used
in my computers has been Ubuntu. In this period I read
these wiki-pages many times, and from start to end
before writing this application.
3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private
Apport crash report bug before making it public? See
Bugs/HowToTriage <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>
for more information.
- I should look for "CoreDump.gz" and remove it if the
stack trace provides enough details.
- I should check into "Stacktrace.txt" and
"ThreadStacktrace.txt" for any sensitive information
like passwords, bank account numbers, CSS keys, user
names or server names.
4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that
you are interested in helping out with?
There isn't. My objective is Ubuntu to be perceived
stable as a hole, by working on bugs that are more
obvious and making them to be triaged as fast as possible.
5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have
triaged and include an explanation of your decisions. Please
note that these bugs should be representative of your very
best work and they should demonstrate your understanding of
the triage process and how to properly handle bugs. For
*all* the bugs in the list, please indicate what importance
you would give it *and* explain the reasoning. /Please use
urls in your list of bugs./
Bandwidth limit is not correctly enforced: Transmission
delays are inserted between data chunk writes (of
arbitrary sizes)
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/+bug/720707>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear as
possible. Also the original one didn't have proper steps
to reproduce it.
- I deeply investigated the origin of the bug and how to
workaround it. I provided the tools to test it by the
users themselves.
- I would give it an importance of "high", since it has
a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users.
This above bug here isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and
unless I'm mistaken is outside the scope of bug control.
(ubuntuone-storage-protocol project is not the same as the
Ubuntu project and packages.)
Misinformation when intending to download the 64-bit
edition
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/585940>
- I completely rewrote the hole bug, since it didn't
reflect the scope of the hole long discussion hold.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since it's
usability issue that does not limit the functionality of
Ubuntu but rather creates a probable non-ideal
configurations scenario.
The above bug ALSO isn't in the Ubuntu project itself, and unless
I'm mistaken is outside the scope of bug control.
(ubuntu-website-content project is not the same as the Ubuntu
project and packages.)
Unable to upgrade "commercial/binary-i386/Packages"
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1072705>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear as
possible.
- I asked the user to add the missing log files as
separate attachments, in order to have them
automatically available. Also marked the bug as incomplete.
- Also asked to gather information using apport, since
it was missed.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since the
program itself suggest the origin of the problem is a
misconfiguration.
upgrade issues 12.04=>12.10
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1100189>
- I transformed this but to a question, since the user
made a cross-dependency issue himself by using an
experimental ppa for xorg. So it wasn't a bug but a
support request.
- Since it is not longer a bug, its importance cannot be
set. However is would give it an importance of "low",
since it's hoped the user to be the only one affected.
When selected partition is not focused, it becomes
invisible
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1079196>
- I attached an screen-cast which clearly showed the
problem, but now I think screen-casts are useless when
the bug description is clear.
- I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an
usability issue that does not limit the functionality of
the application.
- I assigned the bug to the "Paper Cuts Ninja" project,
since of its low importance in a application provided in
the default installation.
Or have a look at any other bug from the bunch I have here
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>, although they
aren't the most impressive in the world. But happy birthday
to me: I recently got my twenty-fives and also got at the
same time my hundred bugs worked in. And if you notice any
errata in this application there will be no problem in
asking me to improve it.
Regards,
Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e)
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>
El 08/01/13 15:10, C de-Avillez escribió:
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 00:36:30 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Please, accept me to join Ubuntu BugSquad and BugControl in Launchpad
and I will show you what Raring is going to be. If you need more info
about me and how familiar I am with the triaging process, you can have a
look at my profile in Launchpad<https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e>.
My fault there regarding the Ubuntu-BugSquad. I have added you in (and
processed all other pending requests).
For Ubuntu BugControl the process is different. You must show you understand
how we use status and importance, and you must show bugs you triaged. This
process is explained in [1].
Cheers,
..C..
[1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl
So?
--
Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
Ubuntu-bugsquad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Ubuntu-bugsquad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
Do you have any other specific selections of bugs you would like
to showcase?
(as well, bugsquad does not need to receive the application
emails, so please do not include the bugsquad mailing list in
your "To" or "Cc" fields)
------
Thomas
