ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>]

El 25/03/14 15:13, Vish escribió:
> Rather than define the papercut as "insignificant", it is better to 
> define it as "*trivial to fix*" or "*suspected to be a trivial fix*".
Yes, I have just been thinking about this. So:

A papercut '''is''' a software defect that potentially is:

 * '''trivial''' to fix by one person within a day.
 * affecting the '''future''' [[Releases|release]].

Vish, thanks for your backing :)