ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Harold Sitter recently pointed me to this page (
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Specs/LucidBugTriagePolicy ) that it
appears he created describing a change in the Kubuntu bug triaging
policy that says to invalidate bugs that are present upstream, and ask
the user to go report it upstream, rather than report it upstream and
link the launchpad report to the upstream report.  This is in direct
conflict with the Ubuntu bug triaging policies.  Since kubutu is just
a respin of the Ubuntu project on launchpad and the bugs comingle,
this seems rather unwise.

Was this policy sanctioned by the community council / tech board?  And
wouldn't it be wise to separate the projects ( on launchpad ) if they
are going to have radically different policies?  At the very least,
the Ubuntu policy should be updated to indicate this and describe how
to tell if a package falls under kubuntu instead of ubuntu.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTM3kKAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwFZcH/23/2hFRzydyXZ3z3FsD4zNk
hIWcDYfi1ffL3UNPM8nkTW5i1rRh7srHd+csvBel8lGrMc2eIGq4oUXApPTIVhhw
l5/YpVTw1LMzRQefAmQ3s2RcsQ38gMD7feKvRwINrl2fsnxIK91/LpwZkw5303mm
T8gIW9Yy6pRVH0R6HyZAXD9NL8JQZ5QGQ8FDIwJ79fFifQlqtvcivbX4IK9lHRfA
PGo2ZfpgV5V9cLSHFcIqQQulVCLt5ufJQECr1cWwpjwqDcCiQn15v6JmhEBjgd08
ZK+emoIPC8TL2URk/FY/g3KnJMUVZXopE+b2qq8XQiQdze8YWj+WhiVC9HcHXH8=
=4KYN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----