ubuntu-defect-analysts team mailing list archive

[Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 02:43:04PM -0700, Brad Figg wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 02:37 PM, Brian Murray wrote:
> >My manager mentioned to me that searching for Ubuntu bug tasks targeted
> >to the next milestone, ubuntu-11.10, and with an Importance of High or
> >Critical was Oopsing in Launchpad.  Subsequently, I've created the
> >following report:
> >
> >http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/foundations-bugs/foundations-bugs-next-milestone-important-bug-tasks.html
> >
> >and of course there is one for every team.  I've only listed it in the
> >foundations section of the index because I wasn't sure if you'd actually
> >want to use it.
> >
> >I hope its of some use to you!
> >
> >--
> >Brian Murray
> >Ubuntu Bug Master
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Have you all seen:
> 
> http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/rls-mgr-o-tracking-bugs.html
> http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/kernel-bugs/reports/oneiric-milestone-bugs.html

No, thanks for pointing these out to us.  Perhaps we should create a
general section in http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/index.html and
add these?

What is the criteria for a bug to be tagged rls-mgr-o-tracking?

There was recently a bug report about the package stat graphs and making
the Importance / Status colors be the same as the colors that Launchpad
uses.  This makes sense to me as we are used to the colors on the
Launchpad pages since this is what use the most and it will be easiest
if there is one coloring system for people to follow.  Subsequently,
I'll be changing my graphs and think our reports should do the same.

--
Brian Murray

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature