Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
And please note that this is simply my effort to be productive and participate -- the decision can and should be made collectively, to which I defer with pleasure.
Cheers, Kyle On 01/04/2011 08:52 PM, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
On 01/04/2011 08:50 PM, Ryan Macnish wrote:There is already consensus that the book design should be in line with the new Ubuntu branding, this has all already been talked about and decided on. Rather than focus on the book design for the moment, the content still has a long way to go.I agree with Kevin, the old ToC was fine, page numbers force the reader to look for the page manually, the old ToC didnt, it was clickable.the new toc is clickable. if it wasn't it would be of no use. CheersRyan MacnishOn Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Kyle Nitzsche <kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:I'd like to add that I also don't think the toc text should be red in color. At least because this is a barrier for people who are color blind. But also because it isn't consistent with the new ubuntu branding. it would be great if we could take some steps to implement a book design here that really feels like a clean implementation of the new Ubuntu look. Cheers, Kyle On 01/04/2011 08:32 PM, Kyle Nitzsche wrote: Hi, This is a matter of opinion, I think, not objective reality. The toc design I just pushed is traditional and I think superior, despite the argument below. If I had to muster an argument, it would be as follows: * a toc should be visually distinct from the rest as an aid to the user finding it when scrolling (not confusing it with other textual content) * a good way to do that is the traditional way: a square layout with left justified headings and right justified page numbers with leader dots connecting them * the idea that the 'eye cannot leap' from the headings to the numbers doesn't feel true to me, and page numbers don't matter much anyway in pdfs (what matters is clicking on the heading and being taken where you want to go - whoosh) * I found the old design visually unattractive on the page with its ragged (non-justified) right wide page numbers. It just floated in empty space amorphously. My two cents. Cheers, Kyle On 01/04/2011 08:20 PM, Kevin Godby wrote: 'allo. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Kyle Nitzsche <kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: With bzr revision 52, I changed the table of contents design (as a working idea) so that it look like one. That is, it has chapters on the left, then leader dots, then page number on the right. This involved using the tocloft pkg and removing some seemingly unused code in ubuntu-developer-manual.cls. The table of contents (TOC) was designed the way it was because it's easier to use that way. You're not summing up a column of numbers; you're trying to locate the page number where the chapter/section begins. The reason you used leaders was because otherwise your eye would find it difficult to track across the entire width of the page to locate the proper page number. So the leaders are a poor work-around. Your design now leads to the reader to naturally group the pages numbers together in a column and the section headings together in a separate column. This is the opposite effect that you want in a table of contents. Robert Bringhurst says it better than I in his _The Elements of Typographic Style_: "Lists, such as contents pages and recipes, are opportunities to build architectural structures in which the space between elements both separates and binds. The two favorite ways of destroying such an opportunity are setting great chasms of space that the eye cannot leap without help from the hand, and setting unenlightening rows of dots (dot leaders, they are called) that force the eye to walk the width of the page like a prisoner being escorted back to its cell." I much prefer the original layout. Though, if you have specific arguments against them, I'm happy to discuss them and try to find a good solution. --Kevin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-developer-manual> Post to : ubuntu-developer-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ubuntu-developer-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-developer-manual> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-developer-manual> Post to : ubuntu-developer-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ubuntu-developer-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-developer-manual> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual Post to : ubuntu-developer-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-developer-manual More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
new-toc-design.png
Description: PNG image
Attachment:
old-toc-design.png
Description: PNG image
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |