ubuntu-hams team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-hams team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00320
Re: cqrlog - was: Logging Software
Please note that cqrlog is in the PPA for releases previous to Precise,
and in the archive for Precise.
However, it is currently broken in Precise. This was originally due to
an error in another package that cqrlog was dependent on, and this
affected Petr's ability to try to make the changes necessary for hamlib.
I just communicated with Petr yesterday about this, he's aware of the
problem and wants to fix it but he's buried in personal life and work
right now. It's not clear when it will be fixed for Precise but it will
almost certainly be after the release freeze.
Steve, AI4QR
On 04/04/2012 07:31 AM, Jeff Lane wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 11:08 PM, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>>> If you want to try CQRlog, you'll probably be better served installing
>>> the 1.3.1 .deb from its home page:
>>>
>>> http://www.cqrlog.com
>>>
>>> as the latest version is not yet able to be packaged by Kamal for
>>> Debian/Ubuntu as I understand it.
>>>
>>> 73, de Nate>>
>>
>> There is a PPA for cqrlog:
>>
>> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ok2cqr/ppa
>>
>> I'll give it a try when I get my station re-assembled (hopefully in
>> the next few weeks). In the past I used TLF for both contest and
>> general logging but it is time to move on.
>
> First, thanks for the suggestions and discussion. Keep it going :-)
> it's been interesting thus far and not terribly surprising.
>
> I'll give cqrlog a look. I noticed it sitting in software center
> yesterday but I didn't look at it too closely. Looking now, I do see
> that it's version 1.2.2, so I'll add that PPA and give it a whirl.
>
> In any case, bear in mind that I don't necessarily have a problem with
> paper logs... my biggest issue is that I may not always have my notebook
> with me when I'm making contacts on the air, which leads to writing down
> log info on scraps of paper, arms, or whatever which can lead to lost
> log entries.
>
> Also, thanks for the info on LoTW. I thought it was more ... feature
> rich than eQSL, but admittedly, I've not really looked too closely at it
> until now as I always just associated those things with people who are
> really interested in contesting or awards like DXCC, where I am far
> more... casual. I just like getting on the air and talking to people
> from time to time.
>
> Anyway, need to grab breakfast and get ready to start work for the day.
>
> Thanks again, 73 de Jeff
>
References