ubuntu-manual-bugs team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual-bugs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00438
[Bug 586283] [NEW] Double "should", p.59
Public bug reported:
Rev. 788
Ch. 3, § "History", p. 59 (PDF p. 61)
Type: style
Manual has:
Firefox should open a “sidebar” on the left side of the browser window, which should contain your browsing history categorized as “Today,” “Yesterday,” “Last 7 days,” “This month,” and then monthly for the times before that.
This sentence doesn't need two "should"s questioning whether that will
actually occur; a comma should also precede "categorized"; and moving
the location to the beginning helps join what Firefox does and why.
On the left side of the browser window, Firefox should open a “sidebar”
containing your browsing history, categorized as “Today,” “Yesterday,”
“Last 7 days,” “This month,” and then monthly for the times before that.
** Affects: ubuntu-manual
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Double "should", p.59
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Manual.
Status in Ubuntu Manual: New
Bug description:
Rev. 788
Ch. 3, § "History", p. 59 (PDF p. 61)
Type: style
Manual has:
Firefox should open a “sidebar” on the left side of the browser window, which should contain your browsing history categorized as “Today,” “Yesterday,” “Last 7 days,” “This month,” and then monthly for the times before that.
This sentence doesn't need two "should"s questioning whether that will actually occur; a comma should also precede "categorized"; and moving the location to the beginning helps join what Firefox does and why.
On the left side of the browser window, Firefox should open a “sidebar” containing your browsing history, categorized as “Today,” “Yesterday,” “Last 7 days,” “This month,” and then monthly for the times before that.
Follow ups
-
[Bug 586283] Re: Double "should", p.59
From: Chris Woollard, 2010-08-18
-
[Bug 586283] Re: Double "should", p.59
From: Jason.Cook599, 2010-05-27
-
[Bug 586283] Re: Double "should", p.59
From: Jason.Cook599, 2010-05-27
-
[Bug 586283] Re: Double "should", p.59
From: Jason.Cook599, 2010-05-27
-
[Bug 586283] [NEW] Double "should", p.59
From: Marc Stewart, 2010-05-27
References