ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive

[Luke-Jennings <ubuntujenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:35 +0100, Luke-Jennings wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:04 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
> > For the Learning team:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:48 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
> > > > What are the (current) required delivery formats by stakeholders. My
> > > > guesses:
> > > >    * ubuntu-docs: mallard, xhtml, others?
> > > >    * ubuntu-manual: xhtml, pdf, others? 
> > 
> > ubuntu-learning-materials: pdf, svg, png, text and code files for
> > publishing. Svg, asciidoc for editing.
> > 
> > Martin,
> > 
> ubuntu-manual
> 
> A form of getting from the format of the content pool to latex files
> *.tex to turn into pdf, png's.
> 
> thats all I can think off hopefully i have not missed anything
> 
> Luke 
> 
I have made a pro's and cons' list [1] for mallard and docbook as I
think those are the main content pool options. I have also added the
teams required formants. If each team can populate the pros and cons
also add any more requirements at the bottom.

Hopefully then we can make a good well judged choice on the format in
the meeting.

Luke Jennings
(jenkins on #freenode)

[1] http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/prosandcons