ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02066
Re: An interesting blog by Matt Zimmerman touches on docs
The reason it may be a problem is that often when I don't have an internet
connection, I need to know how to use an applications that have not yet
learned how to use or am experiencing problems with. Though most are
self-explanatory, some app are more complex and, when using this method, I
can't use them or solve the problem until I get and internet connection. As
I previously mention, if there was an easy way to download the documentation
for offline use, then this method would work. Until there is a way
to access the internet from *everywhere* this, at least in my opinion, this
won't work.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kyle Nitzsche
<kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hi Jason?
>
> On 07/09/2010 06:32 AM, Jason Cook wrote:
>
>> I think that a cloud based solution is a great idea. But for mobile users
>> this would a problem.
>>
> Why do you think a web/cloud-based help system a problem for mobile users?
>
>
> One possible solution would be to include *all* of the content that is
>> available online in a repository that *gets updated when the contents on the
>> web changes*. Then is is not just static and can be redesigned. If the
>> downloaded format was HTML, then this would not require another application.
>> I think that a cloud based solution would be great, but there needs to be a
>> easy way to download all of that content locally.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Jim Campbell <jwcampbell@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
>> jwcampbell@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Shaun McCance <shaunm@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:shaunm@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 17:13 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
>> >
>>
>> http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/07/06/weve-packaged-all-of-the-free-software-what-now/
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > With which I agree in general.
>> > * on-disk docs might effectively be limited to only what is
>> necessary to
>> > get started and get connected to the web (localized, of course).
>> > * run-time help links might instead display appropriate
>> content in the
>> > browser.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > Naturally, there are disadvantages, such as:
>> > * no internet connection = no help (beyond the minimal
>> on-disk help)
>> > * umm.. any other disadvantages?
>>
>> A greater disconnect between applications and their help. Our
>> traditional help consists of islands of documents that are
>> largely separate from the applications they document.
>>
>> One of my current projects is a library for deeply integrating
>> help into applications. (It was Phil's idea, although he might
>> not realize it.) Imagine help buttons and menus automatically
>> populated with the most relevant content, searching for help
>> directly in the help menu, and on-board help blurbs that come
>> directly from the help and link into it for more information.
>>
>> These are the sorts of things that user assistance professionals
>> are dreaming about, but most help tool vendors are still stuck
>> in the 90s. We have the opportunity to blaze new trails with
>> free software. Stop playing catchup and make UA professionals'
>> mouths water.
>>
>> It's possible to have this sort of deep integration with cloud
>> content, but it's harder. I have no doubt that help will move
>> more and more to the web, but then, applications will move more
>> and more to the web as well. If we jump there too early without
>> thinking about how to really improve things, we'll lock ourselves
>> into an outdated and inadequate help model.
>>
>> --
>> Shaun
>>
>>
>> To be fair, I don' t think that the two approaches to help have to
>> be mutually exclusive. What Shaun is talking about is awesome
>> application-level help. There will still be a need for people who
>> want that help content in different formats, whether they be
>> manuals or help that is searchable on the web.
>>
>> As for on-disk vs. cloud/web-based content, I think having more
>> web-based content is necessary now. We would still have the
>> option of keeping on-disk help relatively light. For example, we
>> could not include (as many?) screenshots in on-disk help as would
>> be available in other formats.
>>
>> Also, as far as I know, Ubuntu is one of the few distros that
>> ships a good amount of on-disk help at all. Fedora just ships
>> their release notes in the main install, and OpenSUSE (I think)
>> just features some sort of getting-started guide. Both have their
>> other help available for download on their websites. Does anybody
>> know how RHEL and SUSE have theirs set up? Do they have much
>> "distro-specific" help in the base install?
>>
>> As for Apple and Microsoft, they may have a good amount of on-disk
>> help, but they don't concern themselves with fitting all of their
>> OS and applications onto a 700mb CDROM. For base installs they
>> have DVD's and having some of their content accessible via the web.
>>
>> I bring up those comparisons not necessarily to say, "Oh, they do
>> it that way, so that way is the best way," or to say, "Just do it
>> however X group / company is doing it," but to set realistic
>> expectations for us. I want us to be mindful of bandwidth /
>> offline-access issues like the ones that Phil W. brought up, and
>> want to give room for Shaun's application-level help ideas, but a
>> better web-presence for Ubuntu help would also be a big step forward.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual
>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-manual>
>>
>> Post to : ubuntu-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:ubuntu-manual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual
>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-manual>
>>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Jason Cook
Follow ups
References