← Back to team overview

ubuntu-packaging-guide-team team mailing list archive

[Merge] lp:~wxl/ubuntu-packaging-guide/1432970 into lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide

 

Walter Lapchynski has proposed merging lp:~wxl/ubuntu-packaging-guide/1432970 into lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide.

Requested reviews:
  Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team (ubuntu-packaging-guide-team)
Related bugs:
  Bug #1432970 in Ubuntu Packaging Guide: "bad grammar first sentence of section 5.7"
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-packaging-guide/+bug/1432970

For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~wxl/ubuntu-packaging-guide/1432970/+merge/253211

Minor grammatical error. It should be noted I used the Ubuntu Packaging Guide
to guide my actions in implementing this fix ☺
-- 
Your team Ubuntu Packaging Guide Team is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~wxl/ubuntu-packaging-guide/1432970 into lp:ubuntu-packaging-guide.
=== modified file 'debian/changelog'
--- debian/changelog	2014-10-26 12:18:36 +0000
+++ debian/changelog	2015-03-17 14:33:24 +0000
@@ -1,9 +1,13 @@
-ubuntu-packaging-guide (0.3.7) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+ubuntu-packaging-guide (0.3.7ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 
+  [ Dmitry Shachnev ]
   * packaging-new-software: Add bzr-builddeb to the list of required
     packages (LP: #1385567).
 
- -- Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@xxxxxxxxxx>  Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:17:06 +0300
+  [ Walter Lapchynski ]
+  * fixing-a-bug-example: Fix bad grammar in section 5.7 (LP: #1432970).
+
+ -- Walter Lapchynski <wxl@xxxxxxxxxx>  Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:10:27 -0700
 
 ubuntu-packaging-guide (0.3.6) unstable; urgency=medium
 

=== modified file 'ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixing-a-bug-example.rst'
--- ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixing-a-bug-example.rst	2012-10-19 12:57:42 +0000
+++ ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixing-a-bug-example.rst	2015-03-17 14:33:24 +0000
@@ -228,9 +228,9 @@
 Getting the fix included
 ========================
 
-It makes to get fix included as Upstream as possible. Doing that you can 
-guarantee that everybody can take the Upstream source as-is and don't need to 
-have local modifications to fix it.
+It makes sense to get the fix included as Upstream as possible. Doing that you 
+can guarantee that everybody can take the Upstream source as-is and don't need 
+to have local modifications to fix it.
 
 In our case we established that we have a problem with the packaging, both in
 Ubuntu and Debian. As Ubuntu is based on Debian, we will send the fix to 


Follow ups