ubuntu-packaging-guide-team team mailing list archive

[Hans Joachim Desserud <1485311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

I was reading http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-ftbfs.html when I
noticed the following:

"Ubuntu has added arm64 as a architecture recently, but many packages
fail to build on it. A full list of the packages not building are at
qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/arm64.html."

First of all I noticed that the url wasn't a link, but after browsing to
it I found a list of build failures for 14.04. Now that armhf and arm64
are listed on the main FTBFS page (http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/), I
wonder whether this paragraph is still necessary or whether it could be
removed.

Version: 0.3.7~bzr578~ubuntu14.04.1.

** Affects: ubuntu-packaging-guide
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Packaging Guide Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Packaging Guide.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1485311

Title:
  Fixing FTBFS - is separate section on arm64 still necessary?

Status in Ubuntu Packaging Guide:
  New

Bug description:
  I was reading http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-ftbfs.html when
  I noticed the following:

  "Ubuntu has added arm64 as a architecture recently, but many packages
  fail to build on it. A full list of the packages not building are at
  qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/arm64.html."

  First of all I noticed that the url wasn't a link, but after browsing
  to it I found a list of build failures for 14.04. Now that armhf and
  arm64 are listed on the main FTBFS page
  (http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/), I wonder whether this paragraph is
  still necessary or whether it could be removed.

  Version: 0.3.7~bzr578~ubuntu14.04.1.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-packaging-guide/+bug/1485311/+subscriptions