← Back to team overview

ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Design/UX/Apps] Ubuntu behaviour factors

 

Hey all,

During the phone and tablet development we have several times had to
tackle the "it's supposed to look/behave/be like that on the phone, and
like this on the tablet" problem.

In the shell we managed to stay away from "if (tablet) this; elif
(phone) that" in favour of differentiating based on available space.

Since then an argument was made that that's not good enough - we need to
be able to have the 10' interface on a tablet, or the desktop interface
on a TV - regardless of screen size.

But whether the UI looks/behaves in a certain way can’t only be
determined by the single factor of what interaction mode was selected.
What’s more, each display needs to be configured separately (i.e. phone
remains in touch mode when connected to TV with 10’ interface). Each
device will have a default mode associated, and external displays we’ll
try and associate a default mode based on some properties of the display
itself, and then potentially and remember the setup for the future.

We need to come up with a list of factors based on which we decide which
layout, behaviour, user experience is applied.

The list of questions that come to mind (in no particular order):

* what mode was requested (touch, PC, 10', ?)
* what input methods are available (pointer, touch, key, camera?)
* component dimensions
* which stage is the app running in
* device form factor

That seems like a lot, I know, but most of the time you would only
decide based on a subset of those - it very much depends on the case at
hand.

Some examples:
* search entry in dash - it moves “up” over the header title on the
phone, because it wouldn’t fit otherwise - real-estate is enough to
decide on the behaviour here
* click-through notifications - only when there’s a pointer device -
*not* whether it’s a desktop or a phone
* directional navigation - only when there’s means of that navigation -
a keyboard or a remote - *not* whether it’s a phone or a tv

We need many more use cases to verify whether that approach would work,
so bring them on!

Maybe there are other factors to take into account? Or maybe you have
ideas about a completely different approach to this?

I hate to see "tablet, phone, desktop, TV" differentiation when we're
trying to have a converged platform. We need, all of us, to work with a
more holistic approach.

Comments, rants, all feedback welcome :)

P.S.
Responsive Web Design seems very much related
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsive_web_design

Cheers,
--
Saviq, tvoss & Kaleo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Follow ups