ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Henrique Santos Fernandes <sf.rique@xxxxxxxxx>]

The build without the lines on productcopy  result on this:

E/RILD    (  856): dlopen failed: Cannot load library:
load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found
E/RILD    (  859): dlopen failed: Cannot load library:
load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found
E/RILD    (  862): dlopen failed: Cannot load library:
load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found
E/RILD    (  865): dlopen failed: Cannot load library:
load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found
E/RILD    (  868): dlopen failed: Cannot load library:
load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found


And some on syslog that i did see much:

Apr 14 05:35:16 localhost ofonod[424]: create_ril: can't connect to RILD:
No such file or directory (2)


And the build with only the line commented...

E/RILC    (  140): RILD can't accept socket from process root
E/RILC    (  140): RILD must accept socket from radio




So i don't know what else to do...

Does anyone have an ideia?

I guess my build is not compile ril and libsec-ril

Does libsec ril also compiled on ubuntu touch? or this one i should had
removed from the product copy lines?

Thanks

[]'sf.rique


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Henrique Santos Fernandes <
sf.rique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> David Hacker helped me a lot about some stuff.
>
> It seens my device is not compiling ril and using stubs of coping.. not
> sure yet..
>
> I am gonna write down what he helped me to do!
>
>
>> I mentioned this earlier in the thread.
>>
>> Did you examine the source code link I sent you?  If so, you'd see the
>> log calls that output the lines you saw from logcat:
>>
>> > Got this on log cat:
>> >     > E/RILC    (  140): RILD can't accept socket from process root
>> >     > E/RILC    (  140): RILD must accept socket from radio
>> >
>>
>>
>
>> These are the lines removed by the patch ( also referenced in my last
>> patch ).
>>
>
> Yes, i checked the file and the pacth is applied.
>
>
>> I'm not sure...  you did the porting work for this device, correct?  If
>> so, did you modify any of the AOSP source and/or Android .mk files?
>> Just wondering if any changes you made could've affected the application
>> of our patches?
>
>
> I did not changed the .mk files  or the source i did it after, i will
> explain it below.
>
> I did as it says on the wiki for my device ( i wrote it )
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices/galaxysbmtd
>
>
> Let's start what i did so far with David Hacker help.
>
> I ported my device doing adding those to manifest:
>
> <project name="CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_galaxysbmtd" path="device/samsung/galaxysbmtd" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" />
>  <project name="CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_aries-common" path="device/samsung/aries-common" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" />
>  <project name="CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_aries" path="kernel/samsung/aries" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" />
>  <project name="CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung" path="hardware/samsung" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" />
>
> As i told david hacker about this, he saw this on a file called
> boardconfigcommom.mk
> BOARD_USES_LIBSECRIL_STUB := true
>
> But at the file vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/BoardConfigVendor.mk ( that i
> guess overrides the common.mk )
>
> I have this:
> BOARD_USES_LIBSECRIL_STUB := false
>
> So i am a bit confused if i am compiling it or just coping the ril.
>
> He also told me this  could be the problem, my device has ril code it seft.
>
> https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung/tree/cm-10.1/exynos4/ril
>
> Another this is that after extracting my proprietarys i also saw this int
> this file: vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/galaxysbmtd-vendor-blobs.mk
>
> PRODUCT_COPY_FILES += \
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/etc/gps.conf:system/etc/gps.conf \
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/gpsd:system/vendor/bin/gpsd
> \
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/etc/gps.xml:system/vendor/etc/gps.xml
> \
>     vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so:
> system/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so \
> *
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libril.so:system/lib/libril.so \
> *
> *
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libsecril-client.so:system/lib/libsecril-client.so
> \*
> *
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libsec-ril.so:system/lib/libsec-ril.so
> \*
> *    vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/bin/rild:system/bin/rild \*
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/lib/libsensor_yamaha_test.so:system/vendor/lib/libsensor_yamaha_test.so
> \
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/orientationd:system/vendor/bin/orientationd
> \
>
> vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/geomagneticd:system/vendor/bin/geomagneticd
> \
>     vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/modem.bin:modem.bin
>
> So o realy don't know what is happening and why i am not getting the
> patches...
>
> I have looked at my compile code an saw this:
>
> I will translate myself the content
>
> build/core/Makefile:44: warning: imposing/enforcing commands to target
> `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/lib/libril.so'
> build/core/base_rules.mk:502: warning: ignoring old commands to target
> `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/lib/libril.so'
> build/core/Makefile:44: warning: imposing commandss to target
> `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/bin/rild'
> build/core/base_rules.mk:502: warning: ignoring old commands to target
> `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/bin/rild
>
> Don't know if this is saying it is compile or not...
>
> Anyhow, i did two more builds that i have not tested yet. I had no time to
> test it.
>
> One build i just change the variable on common.mk to false.
>
> And another build i removed those lines that referes to ril stuff on
> PRODUCT_COPY_FILES
>
> So yes there anything else i can do? I will try my builds as soon as i
> have time to try debug a bit more.
>
> But if anyone knows something else i can do i would apreciate.
>
> And sorry for my english =]
>
> []'sf.rique
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Tony Espy <espy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2013 04:58 PM, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> > Someone else already told me some pacthes werent applied... i lkooked
>> > and it was applied.
>>
>> I mentioned this earlier in the thread.
>>
>> Did you examine the source code link I sent you?  If so, you'd see the
>> log calls that output the lines you saw from logcat:
>>
>> > Got this on log cat:
>> >     > E/RILC    (  140): RILD can't accept socket from process root
>> >     > E/RILC    (  140): RILD must accept socket from radio
>> >
>>
>>
>
>> These are the lines removed by the patch ( also referenced in my last
>> patch ).
>>
>> > I will remove all my sources and start over with phablet-dev-bootstrap
>> >
>> > I am syng the new repo right now... and will see whats happens...
>> >
>> > But how the pacthes cant be applied if if i am using
>> > phablet-dev-bootstrap -c ?
>>
>> I'm not sure...  you did the porting work for this device, correct?  If
>> so, did you modify any of the AOSP source and/or Android .mk files?
>> Just wondering if any changes you made could've affected the application
>> of our patches?
>>
>> > Well, i just started to sync from another computer... it shold work
>> > right? =]
>> >
>> > Lets see...
>>
>> Keep us posted.
>>
>> /tony
>>
>>
>>
>