ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03995
Re: Catching CPU run-aways on Touch
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:01:37PM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 09/05/2013 12:42 PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > On 05/09/13 10:33, Colin Ian King wrote:
> >> On 05/09/13 10:23, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> >>> Stuart Langridge brought up an interesting idea for this on IRC, which
> >>> I'm copying here rather than having more side discussions:
> [...]
>
> Oops, I should have read the whole thread before posting my previous
> e-mail. :-)
>
> > Anyhow, I still think myAppIsRunning() is open to abuse as it will in
> > time be lavishly added to all sorts of tight loops that suck CPU, which
> > just adds more overhead on the long run.
>
> Well, if we don't have a myAppIsRunning() API, apps can simply busy-loop
> whenever they want, so I don't see much harm in adding this API.
> We could also protect it with apparmor, so that the usage of this API
> must be explicitly declared in the application's manifest file (and then
> we could question whether the app has any reason to use it).
>
> Note however that this would still solve the issue of detecting apps who
> use too much CPU time because of some bugs, which I think was the
> original goal.
Would a watchdog sort of timer work better here? One where the OS sends
a signal to a high CPU usage app and if the app doesn't respond to the
signal we have a better clue that something is amiss.
Thanks,
Joe
Follow ups
References