ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Sergio Schvezov <sergio.schvezov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/01/14 11:53, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:46:48AM -0500, Pat McGowan wrote:
> > On 01/19/2014 06:44 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> > > Do we have an ETA to at least just define this?
> > > Do we have a process of what needs to be done after every release?
> > >
> > > Reason for asking it that the reminders app is ready for store upload,
> > > but I'm most certainly sure it won't work on all framework 13.10
> > > supported releases (saucy).
> > What does it depend on that was not defined for 13.10? We talked about
> > defining a 13.10.1 early Feb for apps that require the recent additions
> > to the framework.

The accounts plugin is the first one that comes to mind:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.trusty/view/head:/touch#L43

> We shouldn't define things as 13.10.x when they aren't in saucy.  It's
> confusing.
>
> > > We don't really need to have it in final form, since this is still
> > > moving along; but having the tag would be good to filter out where we
> > > know this is bound not to work.
> > The Qt 5.2 approach decision somewhat affects the timing and rollout for
> > the 14.04 tag. We also are waiting on the support for multiple
> > frameworks to land.
> I think we should stop waiting for the next thing to land, and simply
> define a 14.04 framework (possibly "beta" or similar, or else just
> defined as unstable) now.  Otherwise we end up deadlocked.

Exactly; I'd just go with 14.04 just like we define trusty, saucy, ... 
for the archives before it's released :-)
We are after all officially unreleased for this cycle still.

Cheers
Sergio