ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone!

IMPORTANT! All landers please read on!

So, as discussed with QA, we have new requirements regarding what
information needs to be provided whenever a silo gets marked as tested
by a lander. These new rules will allow QA engineers to have a better
understanding how the testing has proceeded and who to contact when in
any doubts.

We are making some small changes to the information provided about silo
testing to make the sign off process smoother and avoid confusion.
First, you need to add two small details - the name of the tester and
the device used for testing.

Second, it is recommended that you add comments on the testing that was
done for your silo in the 'Test plans' field. Note that if you just list
a test plan without further comment it will be assumed that *every* test
in the test plan was run and passed - so please use the field as an
opportunity to note any tests that were not run for whatever reason, or
failed because of an existing bug.

So, in short, when a silo has been tested by a lander, please switch the
'Testing pass?' field to:
Yes (#<image number> <device> <tester>)
e.g.
Yes (#33 krillin sil2100)

Please note that QA will not perform *any* QA sign-off for silos that do
not follow the new recommendations. So we kindly ask all landers to
apply these new rules ASAP.

Thank you!

Best regards,

-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 www.canonical.com