Hello everybody,
I'm new here and now a bit confused about version numbers.
In my case it was version 127, not 128, that wouldn't boot. Also, at
http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed/flo/ (i'm
using a nexus 7) the highest version is 128. Yet you are discussing
129.
Could somebody help me understand this?
Thanks in advance,
Aat de Vries.
On 03/11/2015 02:01 AM, Alan O'Dannel wrote:
> Thanks Victor, I'll reload. Alan
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:51:51 PM PDT, Victor Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <
>> ricardo.salveti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Michał Sawicz
>>> <michal.sawicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > W dniu 10.03.2015 o 20:41, Alan O'Dannel pisze:
>>> >> Too late. Just found out the hard way.
>>> >
>>> > Confirmed, it never gets past the logo.
>>> >
>>> > To recover, boot to recovery and use
>>> > $ ubuntu-device-flash --revision=127 touch...
>>>
>>> The issue was basically because /sbin/initctl was removed from the
>>> image, making the boot to fail completely. inifinity pushed a fix
in
>>> live-build and I just started to build 129, hopefully that should
be
>>> all good again.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the noise, should hopefully be the last remaining bug
that
>>> we got as a side effect of migrating desktop to systemd.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>> Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
>>>
>>>
>> I can confirm that image 129 works boots as expected.
>>
>> Victor Thompson
>>
>
>
>
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
