ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Walter Lapchynski <wxl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

sounds like a good reason to implement manual testing...

@wxl
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
On Mar 11, 2015 7:05 AM, "Oliver Grawert" <ogra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> hi,
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2015, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan:
> > On 11.03.2015 00:35, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Michał Sawicz
> > > <michal.sawicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> W dniu 10.03.2015 o 20:41, Alan O'Dannel pisze:
> > >>> Too late. Just found out the hard way.
> > >> Confirmed, it never gets past the logo.
> > >>
> > >> To recover, boot to recovery and use
> > >> $ ubuntu-device-flash --revision=127 touch...
> > > The issue was basically because /sbin/initctl was removed from the
> > > image, making the boot to fail completely. inifinity pushed a fix in
> > > live-build and I just started to build 129, hopefully that should be
> > > all good again.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the noise, should hopefully be the last remaining bug that
> > > we got as a side effect of migrating desktop to systemd.
> > Don't we have boot testing nowadays? Or is this a TODO item/ bug report
> > still?
>
> that wouldn't have helped ... seemingly the tests install/remove
> packages and reboot ...
>
> most of our testing is totally moot if we don't actually produce an
> image per landing instead of making the image writeable and taint it
> with package installs (I'm claiming that since we started automated
> testing ;) )
>
> the changes to replace the init system (or rather to prevent us from
> this change on phone images) were on a seed level, you cant really
> emulate this without re-rolling a complete image.
>
> ciao
>         oli
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>