ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Pat McGowan <pat.mcgowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Alan Bell <alanbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> what is the procedure around marking bugs as affecting
> canonical-devices-system-image? I have noticed that some that get fixed are
> marked with that, and the details here
> https://launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image seem to imply that
> things should be reported against that to be looked at by the product team,
> but I am not sure if that is an internal instruction, or for everyone.


It has indeed grown into a life of its own. It is meant to be an escalation
point for the issues we want to ensure get addressed in a certain
timeframe,a s well as providing history what has been resolved. It never
represents 100% of what gets done.


> If we are reporting bugs against specific bits of the phone should we
> report bugs against that project or add that as an also affected project or
> is that something that gets done after triage in the affected component?


Adding them to the specific project or package is preferable.  That way
duplicates and lower priority issues can get triaged away, and higher
priority issues resolved directly.
If folks do not know what package or project to file against, then this
list can be used and someone will redirect it to the correct place. Its
also useful to see if your highest priority issues have been reported and
perhaps turn up the heat with this affects me.

Cheers
Pat

I added it to this bug a moment ago, no idea if I should have done.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1567542
>
> Alan.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>