ubuntu-sdk-bugs team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled

To: ubuntu-sdk-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Pat McGowan <pat.mcgowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:13:21 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 1393485 <1393485@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
SDK bug tracking, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485

Title:
  [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled

Status in Canonical System Image:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu UX:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Updated description]

  Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization.
  Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI.

  --- UX Solution ---
  Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer

  –––

  Desired solution:

  Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be
  consistent with our disabled states on buttons.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions