ubuntu-touch-coreapps-reviewers team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-touch-coreapps-reviewers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01558
Re: [Merge] lp:~flscogna/ubuntu-terminal-app/profile-selection into lp:ubuntu-terminal-app
I prefer 2).
If someone doesn't want to 'waste' the screen real-estate used by the layout, so switches them all off, they'll be disappointed that they don't gain space IMO.
If we force a profile to be active, we're forcing that 'waste' of space for users who don't need it.
I would default to having the layouts enabled by default, but if the user actively has chosen to disable them _all_ then they should expect the consequence that they're gone from the main UI. They've already discovered how to disable them, re-enabling them shouldn't be a stretch for them.
What do you think?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~flscogna/ubuntu-terminal-app/profile-selection/+merge/255077
Your team Ubuntu Terminal Developers is subscribed to branch lp:ubuntu-terminal-app.
References