ubuntu-translations-coordinators team mailing list archive

[David Planella <david.planella@xxxxxxxxxx>]

El dj 17 de 12 de 2009 a les 00:23 +0700, en/na Jeroen Vermeulen va
escriure:
> Hi folks,
> 
> We're getting an import approval conflict for Lucid.  Only one this 
> time, and the warning message gives much better information nowadays:
> 
> WARNING Found 2 competing templates with translation domain 'Linux-PAM': 
> "linux-pam in Ubuntu Lucid package "pam""; "pam in Ubuntu Lucid package 
> "pam"".
> 
> One of these templates is probably redundant.  Someone will have to 
> figure out which, and disable it.
> 
> 

Hi Jeroen,

It was me who approved the 'pam' template. I checked that the same
template existed in hardy, intrepid, jaunty and karmic and approved it.
Unfortunately, I didn't see that the template had been renamed to
'linux-pam' for Lucid.

I guess we should:

     1. Decide what the best name is: 'pam' (as in the upstream project)
        or 'linux-pam' (as the POT file and the translation domain)
     A. If we decide 'pam' is the best name:
              * Disable the 'pam' Lucid template (has no translations)
                and rename the Lucid 'linux-pam' to 'pam'
     B. If we decide 'linux-pam' is the best name:
             1. Disable the 'pam' Lucid template
             2. Rename the 'pam' hardy, intrepid, jaunty and karmic
                templates to 'linux-pam'

Jeroen would this approach be correct?

Due to this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rosetta/+bug/497438 I cannot
(and I guess none of the UTCs can) administer the template, though.

Regards,
David.

-- 
David Planella
Ubuntu Translations Coordinator
david(dot)planella(at)ubuntu(dot)com
www.ubuntu.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Això és una part d'un missatge signada digitalment