← Back to team overview

ubuntugnome-wiki-docs team mailing list archive

Re: Documentation

 

On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:02:58 +0800
James Vorderbruggen <jamesvorder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm in.
> 
> Using their website's content may be a little more difficult than copying
> it with WebHTTrack because they probably used a CMS to generate that
> content.  If we copy their website like this, we will have a website
> incapable of living within a CMS.
> 
> James
> 
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Christopher <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  Would it make sense to use (with permission) Xubuntu's documentation
> > modified for UG? WebHTTrack Website Copier can do the trick.
> >
> >
> > On 2014-10-16 10:26 AM, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
> >
> >     Hi everyone,
> >
> > http://docs.xubuntu.org/
> >
> >  I haven't noticed that except today. Despite the great efforts we have
> > put all together into Ubuntu GNOME for 2 cycles for 12 months or so, we are
> > still far behind others like Xubuntu. Yes, Xubuntu is older than Ubuntu
> > GNOME as a project and community but that should not stop us to go the
> > extra miles and that should not be a reason to remain behind ...
> >
> >  That said, I am very interested to have something similar. After lots of
> > efforts and time to build Ubuntu GNOME Wiki area from scratch, I must say
> > that I am personally not happy with that I have personally achieved and I
> > feel we as a team must do more. Yes, we have achieved the first step, well
> > done everyone but who said that is the end? that was only the beginning :)
> >
> >  Thus, this is the one and only high priority suggest - for now - that I'd
> > like to bring to discussion for Ubuntu GNOME VV Cycle.
> >
> >  Remember, we are talking about 14.04 LTS .. NOT 14.10 nor 15.04 .. why?
> > because these are 9 months releases only and the Wiki Area should be enough
> > for that. Unless of course, you have a logical reason to suggest the
> > otherwise.
> >
> >  So, what do you think? are we able to go for that? I am sure others can
> > help us and I mean Ubuntu Wiki Team but we as Ubuntu GNOME community, are
> > we able to do that?
> >
> >  Again, I am very interested but I will NOT do this alone .. we are a team
> > and we should work as one :)
> >
> >  Thanks!
> >
> >  P.S.
> > Sorry if there are some typos or funny words ... I am so sleepy ... it is
> > 1:30AM now .. ZzZz
> >
> > --
> >    Best Regards,
> >  amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad>
> >  *Remember: *"All of us are smarter than any one of us."
> >
> >  Ubuntu GNOME OneStopPage
> > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/OneStopPage>
> >  Join Ubuntu GNOME <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/GettingInvolved>
> >  Test Ubuntu GNOME <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/Testing>
> >  Contact Ubuntu GNOME <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/ContactUs>
> >  Download Ubuntu GNOME
> > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/GetUbuntuGNOME>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-wiki-docs
> > Post to     : ubuntugnome-wiki-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-wiki-docs
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
I'll give a whirl. I can make a subdomain on a server I lease and see what it looks like. I  had a quick and dirty look at the source code and it seems to be plain old XHTML.


References