ufl team mailing list archive
-
ufl team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00795
Re: [HG UFL] Initial attempt at implementing index renumbering. Needed to disable
Looks ok, but I simplified it further.
Note that we might need a more sofisticated renumbering
later, to discover that e.g. u[i]*v[i] and u[j]*v[j] are the
same expression, for fast optimization of quadrature code.
Also, I moved the argument renumbering to FormData,
take a look at it. I've removed the "classes" and
"*_renumbering" members of FormData. We should
go through the FormData structure soon to finalize
it as well as we can.
I've confusingly used the term "coefficient" in e.g.
FormData, I guess we should stick to "function" in UFL.
Agreed?
Also, we should always write "basis_function" instead of "basisfunction"?
Martin
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:12:23PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote:
>> ok, will fix.
>
> I made an attempt to fix this. See if it looks better. I've also
> removed the set_count() function.
>
> --
> Anders
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmhyg8ACgkQTuwUCDsYZdF8lACgkWyjq3y+bHdfBGXJnHKztv2a
> ycUAnApKmw5493PWMwLm25ciP4GbBvoz
> =4AeI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> UFL-dev mailing list
> UFL-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/ufl-dev
>
>
Follow ups
References