← Back to team overview

ufl team mailing list archive

Re: [Ffc] New syntax for mixed and enriched spaces

 



On 21 March 2010 21:32, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After Marie's latest addition of enriched spaces (and some discussion
with Doug Arnold), it seems clear that our current notation V + W for
mixed spaces is not optimal.

Even though one may think of the operation of creating a "mixed
function space" as a direct sum,

 X = {(v, 0) : v in V} \oplus {(0, w) : w in W},

it is more natural (and common) to think of it as a Cartesian product,

 X = V \times W = {(v, w) : v in V, w in W}

It would therefore be more natural to use '*' instead of '+' as the
operation for creating mixed elements/function spaces.

That would free up '+' to be used for enriched spaces (which have
recently been added),

 X = {v + w : v in V, w in W}

The typical example would be to take V piecewise linears and W scaled
P3 bubbles.

In summary, the suggestion is to use the following notation:

 +  <-->  +
 *  <-->  \times

It's obvious this is better than what we have now which is

 +  <--> \oplus
 ?  <--> +

Thoughts?

Agree.

Kristian

--
Anders

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkumgm4ACgkQTuwUCDsYZdGpcQCgg9I/aC3fIWbCcRQ3FYatNNfe
Tn4An2lqiC4goZ0q2zczyx/yAmillgSH
=I7N3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc
Post to     : ffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


References