unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07608
Re: why compiz in place of mutter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
supernova wrote on 29/01/12 08:22:
>
> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it
> works very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat
> than the gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I
> guess it is due to compiz, which is more heavy than mutter. Why
> don't use mutter then? Unity doesn't use effects as rotation and
> wobbly. So mutter could be sufficient.
>
> ...
When Unity switched from Mutter to Compiz in 2010, one of the Unity
developers posted an explanation.
<http://njpatel.blogspot.com/2010/10/marks-keynote-at-uds-spoke-about-one-of.html>
And so did one of the Compiz developers.
<http://smspillaz.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/a-bright-new-future-for-compiz/>
- --
mpt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8luXMACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecrmhACePPq8c5rnyBfAjWUTYVhurS6L
wosAnilV8XXzFmxshM0TWDWlRPUhrAOa
=rBtG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
References