unity-design team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: why compiz in place of mutter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
supernova wrote on 29/01/12 08:22:
> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it
> works very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat
> than the gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I
> guess it is due to compiz, which is more heavy than mutter. Why
> don't use mutter then? Unity doesn't use effects as rotation and
> wobbly. So mutter could be sufficient.
When Unity switched from Mutter to Compiz in 2010, one of the Unity
developers posted an explanation.
And so did one of the Compiz developers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----