Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 02/29/2012 06:26 PM, Ian Santopietro wrote:
Ok , I think you're right and the Run dialogue shouldn't be replaced , but I'm still writing the dash "run:" thing on my list of suggestions ;)Do you think the idea with the "run:" / "exec:" syntax is dangerous ? I think there isn't much difference between knowing that syntax and knowing to press alt+F2 .Not inherently, but it forces all of the users who actually use Alt+F2 to relearn the shortcut, and doesn't make the system any faster/easier. Basically all change, no gain.I would not change the syntax by adding a command as run or something different. I simply would include features of the ALT+F2 to the dash. it will add a lot of responsiveness to the system.Definitely not. This is advanced functionality that should never be exposed to new users. Plus, there needs to be a distinction between opening an _application_ and running a _command_, even for experienced users.
Just saw the new responce: On 02/29/2012 06:30 PM, Ryan Gauger wrote:
On 02/29/2012 09:44 AM, Petko wrote:That would take too long to run a command. It has been Alt+F2 for years. There is an old southern American saying. It goes: "If it isn't broke, don't fix it!"That sounds cool , but accidental runs should be avoided . Here's what I thought of when I saw your idea :open dash -> type command with "run:" or "execute:" or something like that in front of it ( "run:ubuntu-bug unity" ) -> "Run command in terminal ?" dialogue appears -> Ok -> a terminal opens and executes the command .I think the confirmation dialogue should have a checkbox not to appear again .Petko
I don't think it would take that long , and it appears to me that it would integrate some more functionality nicely into dash . Still as I said above - that idea stays as an addition , and not a replacement to the "Run" dialogue .
Petko
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |