unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09215
Re: managing packages
If I look at precise:
packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic
packages.ubuntu.com/precise/linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic-pae
Which gives all the installed sizes of the generic kernel. All are in
excess of 100 MB, with amd64 topping the list at around 130 MB.
It is something trivial if you ask me and should be optional to be
automated. When the algorithm has proved to not break the system it should
be turned on by default. But that is all positive thinking about the future.
With metta, Chris
On Apr 29, 2012 6:38 PM, "Elias K Gardner" <zorkerz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ian Santopietro <isantop@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Quite frankly, the kernel packages accumulating throughout a cycle don't
>> really take up a significant portion of storage. I don't think its worth
>> the risk of causing OS damage just to clear out a few MB of disk space.
>
>
> Aren't they upwards of 100MB each? Numerous times I have been running out
> of space and just needed to clear out the old kernels.
>
Follow ups
References
-
managing packages
From: supernova, 2012-04-27
-
Re: managing packages
From: Daniel Hollocher, 2012-04-27
-
Re: managing packages
From: Michele Giacomoli, 2012-04-28
-
managing packages
From: Aditya Vaidya, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: Ryan Gauger, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: Aditya Vaidya, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: Ryan Gauger, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: supernova, 2012-04-28
-
managing packages
From: Aditya Vaidya, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: supernova, 2012-04-28
-
Re: managing packages
From: supernova, 2012-04-29
-
Re: managing packages
From: Chris, 2012-04-29
-
Re: managing packages
From: supernova, 2012-04-29
-
Re: managing packages
From: Chris Druif, 2012-04-29
-
Re: managing packages
From: Ian Santopietro, 2012-04-29
-
Re: managing packages
From: Elias K Gardner, 2012-04-29