unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09538
Re: Transparency Behind Launcher Option
That's true - it would be easier to run into bugs if we did make it an option.
On May 24, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Ian Santopietro <isantop@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rather than making the transparency an option, we should focus efforts into improving the transparency performance such that it has a negligible effect on performance. That makes Unity faster and better looking for everyone, and reduces code complexity and bug chance.
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Ryan Gauger <rtgkid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I just had an idea that may speed up Unity even further. We could perhaps make transparency behind the launcher an option, so that if users choose to disable it, their computer's performance and speed should run a bit smoother. Just an idea :) Thanks!
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> Post to : unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> --
> Ian Santopietro
>
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>
> "Eala Earendel enlga beorohtast
> Ofer middangeard monnum sended"
>
> Pa gur yv y porthaur?
>
> Public GPG key (RSA): http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x412F52DB1BBF1234
>
References