yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>]

Václav Šmilauer said:     (by the date of Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:19:58 +0100)

> What do you think? You know I am against doing this (wm3, etc.), but
> this is just too much.

I don't like the idea either. But if it's really necessary to make
python+qglviewer(+qt4) working please go on.

The best as I'd like it to see is:

- still have qt3 gui
- use python + qglviewer + qt4

both mutually exclusive due to possible qt3-dev qt4-dev compilation
conflicts, if there are really any. So you would say:

  scons exclude='qt3'       # and get python+qt4, or:
  scons exclude='qt4python' # and get qt3 gui AND python without qt4+qglviewer

is that possible, or maybe you see another way? (or use different
name for qt4python option)


But also, add an option to use local qglviewer, just like the
useMiniWm3 option. So finally, to use python+qglviewer(+qt4) you
would need to run scons as:

  scons exclude='qt3' useLocalQGLViewer=True

or, sth. like that. Is it how you see it happening? Or use different
names of course :)

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |
_______________________________________________
yade-dev mailing list
yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-dev