Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
What is questionable in the first place is that sphere-* contact is represented as sphere-sphere contact (sphere-facet, sphere-box).that's the point. Something is wrong about the architecture of code, because it encourages bad behavior, like yours. What's wrong, how to fix it?
I tried to fix that with Dem3DofGeom which already works quite fine for sphere-sphere and sphere-facet. It has virtual methods for getting deformations on the contact, therefore the constitutive law doesn't care if it is sphere-sphere or sphere-facet (but still can know it, would it be needed). If I have some time, I will also create incremental version of those, which will be basically SpheresContactGeometry for sphere-sphere and something similar for sphere-facet. Then it will be interesting to compare them peformancewise and precisionwise.
Vaclav
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |