yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03110
Re: Fwd: Re: Is shear incremental calculation verified
-
To:
yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:16:47 +0100
-
Face:
iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAALVBMVEUBAQEtLS1KSkpRUVFXV1dYWFhjY2Nzc3N3d3eHh4eKioqdnZ24uLjLy8vc3NxVIagyAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAALEwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH2AIVEzgS1fgQtQAAAjRJREFUOMtt1DFv00AUAOAzFQNbjigSyoQaRaBMhKgLUyKXpVNNeUpk9vyDqFJhQ1kiBuaqAwJCqvPtSLY7RlTn5+5IdnYkkt/AOyfxXVLe5vf53Z1875kd34tOEax8djmj6GyjhB5bxz50GdsVZr9fqRjZwAtKOJw5Wqs2MMZ16ALHsaDncF7xAHix1oEFHAB8f+pRjcO4gfZDykcYzbiucRolOLUJ6kjA0xtVt+A6TySlM0RajIpK6DzwKZ/nOYbF/gclHMo1ZOHYY/+Ha+AWuM+3oMS4eeqYzZ8FiCltgUqI8cd2wwAVpJk+8LWYjBtnJdQpHQqJMd4Oxt4bU9ESiFGc5hkqaH74asAX4iabP5I5gZ+qjgGlJCqZa3h3lxhoeVcSE1qLQC4sqKOK9MGW9E3izFqqHokoztLFEgXg31sbZEKnWi2T74A4NxfVQqlkjKtcAWD+zcArFEES01dR0E/nnV0IgugmDd/2L84sOAouRBBHEc7gtc8teDkRlE0iNQPo2w3Xhh/D4TCIQ4LRLoTvgwjj6RRgavdurxYGMaIuGOyAW/PpNlCcU9/93AHenAWYjPoAwa+G3e3to/MgFNTAEKvKDjzuCzHTnY3qqdXtx24VijzQfZ0yewZ5cwRFQaa+mIYr1uI0I76+3W4xhlvoVRwOA0Fdl64HlJnxP6T8YpX/Lga4Wv4A3ErrU5oTfN7Mu/llXMl8RXEPji/lQkN3H7qXqgC2By47EXeU/7PJ/wPxRKMnuZwIeAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
-
In-reply-to:
<cbd3ca2ca83a349466a9ce7187947a46@arcig.cz>
eudoxos said: (by the date of Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:45:39 +0100)
>
> > The abstract only speaks about twist/bending decomposition. We do that
> > routinely, using Janek's (CohesiveFrictional) or Vaclav's (Dem3Dof)
> > code.
> Dem3Dof has onlz normal-shear displacement, no twist-bending. That is (was)
> in Dem6DofGeom.
Vaclav, IIRC, you did use my formula from CohesiveFrictional for
bending in Dem6DofGeom? Just curious question.
It seems that I will clean up this code next semester, because it
becomes part of my habilitation degree (en abrégé HDR). And yeah,
that code is a total mess, we all know this ;)
--
Janek Kozicki |
Follow ups
References