yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03532
Re: GravityEngine loop
> I would just prefer to skip addForce() when the shape is not a sphere.
> But it needs to be tested before to be sure we will have a benefit
> from this.
_Why_ do you prefer that? I don't think it is systematic:
(a) if you add new Shape, then, surprise! It will be silently skipped by
GravityEngine... what the heck? (think of Boxes, anyway)
(b) How do you check for sphere? Yade's RTTI (getClassIndex etc) results
in a virtual function call. That will do certainly more harm than one
multiplication and one addition (f+=mass*accel).
(c) NewtonIntegrator will skip non-dynamic bodies, hence it incurs no
performance penalty either for facets.
> Or, another option, I can add SubscribedBodiesID into the
> gravityEngine, like an option, to apply the gravity only to subscribed
> bodies to escape loop over facets.
This would harm most simulations, as we would have to keep huge list of
bodies. If you really thing this is so important, create new
PartialGravityEngine (or whatever you call it) that will apply gravity
just to subscribers.
v
Follow ups
References