yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05365
Re: Dem3DOFGeom : ScGeom
> After some thinking, I tried what you'll find in r2365. What do you think?
What is the reason for merging? I don't see any single benefit in that.
The only would be if you precomputed summary shear displacement rather
than increment, so that it could be stored from Dem3Dof and ScGeom
together, but you do not do that.
Do you have a design paper/wiki page etc for ScGeom? I cannot read all
that code now. To my taste, it is all too hairy to serve as a good
basis.
You put twisting/bending inside ScGeom. That is not economical and just
adding that to Dem3DofGeom without any value added... why?!
> those classes contains mostly duplicated code btw
No more than necessary.
The fact of not distinguishing sphere+{sphere,facet,wall} cases makes me
think it cannot work properly, especially when it comes to plasticity
and so on.
Sorry to be brief. To summarize: I don't understand the reason for that.
v
Follow ups
References