yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Bruno!

I think, it should be HARDLY tested before doing such things.
I would test it, but if it is in a separate branch.

Anton


2010/7/14 Václav Šmilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>

>
> > After some thinking, I tried what you'll find in r2365. What do you
> think?
>
> What is the reason for merging? I don't see any single benefit in that.
>
> The only would be if you precomputed summary shear displacement rather
> than increment, so that it could be stored from Dem3Dof and ScGeom
> together, but you do not do that.
>
> Do you have a design paper/wiki page etc for ScGeom? I cannot read all
> that code now. To my taste, it is all too hairy to serve as a good
> basis.
>
> You put twisting/bending inside ScGeom. That is not economical and just
> adding that to Dem3DofGeom without any value added... why?!
>
> > those classes contains mostly duplicated code btw
> No more than necessary.
>
> The fact of not distinguishing sphere+{sphere,facet,wall} cases makes me
> think it cannot work properly, especially when it comes to plasticity
> and so on.
>
> Sorry to be brief. To summarize: I don't understand the reason for that.
>
> v
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>