yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05814
Re: [Branch ~yade-dev/yade/trunk] Rev 2457: 1. Changes in debian/rules due to new conception of debug-build http://www.mail-archive.com/yade-...
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Vaclav Smilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > - dh_strip --exclude=yade${_VERSION}-dbg # don't strip the debug
> package
> > +# dh_strip --exclude=yade${_VERSION}-dbg # don't strip the debug
> package
> Eeeee, this is not right! We want to strip all packages (i.e. the
> optimized one) but not the debug one, so that line is OK. The yade
> ${_VERSION}-dbg refers to the package, not to binary. So this line can
> be left as-is.
>
> > dh_compress
>
EEh, sorry, I have read your mail too late, I have uploaded already 2455r to
ppa. Will try to interrupt its building.
>
> While you are at this, can you comment the dh_compress line? I just
> found out that scripts packages with 0.50 (examples and scripts) are .gz
> compressed, so must be unconveniently ungzipped before being run.
>
> Otherwise, some problems with packaging? Does maverick work now?
>
Let me try with the last revision and I will let you know.
>
> For the binary packages at launchpad, it makes sense that they don't let
> people upload binary packages. What we might to do is to upload only
> source packages and have binary ones built in Grenoble (perhaps, if we
> get it to work with Remi next week); they would be in a separate
> repository, but not more difficult to install than packages from the
> ppa.
>
> Ok, but will people trust external repository?
> Cheers, v.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References