yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Chiara Modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bruno, actually I was going to send you an email about that (nice
synchronicity). Is it the same then? Could you be so kind to explain me why?
Sorry if I ask, I know it is something we already discussed on the list (see
this whole thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01868.html)
but have still some doubts on it.
Thank you, Chiara


On 12 November 2010 16:48, Chareyre <674000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Chiara,
>
> If it was updated as you suggest, would there be a use to keep the
> homoDeform=1 option?
> It would be the same as homoDeform=2 it seems.
>
> Bruno
>
> --
> homoDeform=1 does not handle the periodic case correctly.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674000
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: New
>
> Bug description:
> Currently, in the periodic case, if homoDeform=1 (alias Cundall way) we do
> not adjust the values of the relative velocities as according to the
> velocity gradient. This should be done, since, in such a case, we only
> update particle positions and not particle velocities.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/yade/+bug/674000/+subscribe
>

-- 
homoDeform=1 does not handle the periodic case correctly.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674000
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yade
developers, which is subscribed to Yade.

Status in Yet Another Dynamic Engine: New

Bug description:
Currently, in the periodic case, if homoDeform=1 (alias Cundall way) we do not adjust the values of the relative velocities as according to the velocity gradient. This should be done, since, in such a case, we only update particle positions and not particle velocities.