yade-dev team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: twist/bend increment computation

To: Yade Development Group <yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Václav Šmilauer <eu@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:53:55 +0100
In-reply-to: <20101201184446.2dfc9485@atak.bl.pg.gda.pl>
Mail-followup-to: Yade Development Group <yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-reply-to: Václav Šmilauer <eu@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090105 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

Now, whether to use the (anti)symmetric split vs difference of angular
velocities... What is the reason to use the second one, as you do in
ScGeom6D for instance,

umm, me? I don't remember touching ScGeom6D.

is there something physical reasoning behind, or
is it just an arbitrary choice? How about other DEM codes?

That was @Bruno, sorry for confusion.

References

twist/bend increment computation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-12-01
Re: twist/bend increment computation
From: Janek Kozicki, 2010-12-01
Re: twist/bend increment computation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-12-01
Re: twist/bend increment computation
From: Janek Kozicki, 2010-12-01