yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Christian Jakob <jakob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> It is a good benchmark overall, the problem is that it is hardly
> reproducible. Each run can give a really different total time (more than
> a factor 2 between two measure time, didn't you see that to?

when i run the script with num_balls1D = 10 i get:

Welcome to Yade 2014-02-18.git-af75797
TCP python prompt on localhost:9001, auth cookie `cydaeu'
XMLRPC info provider on http://localhost:21001
Running script calc-time-YADE2014.py
------------------- run 1 of 20 -------------------
1.041
------------------- run 2 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 3 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 4 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 5 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 6 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 7 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 8 of 20 -------------------
1.041
------------------- run 9 of 20 -------------------
1.041
------------------- run 10 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 11 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 12 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 13 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 14 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 15 of 20 -------------------
0.961
------------------- run 16 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 17 of 20 -------------------
1.041
------------------- run 18 of 20 -------------------
1.041
------------------- run 19 of 20 -------------------
1.001
------------------- run 20 of 20 -------------------
1.041

i do not see a factor 2, do you?

can you run the original script and post your results?

c