yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12145
Re: [Yade-users] [Question #268476]: Prallel Computation, CentOS & Ubuntu file versions
-
To:
yade-dev <yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:31:36 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CALF6qJn5fJt=pV1FAa9WOyN=C-7az-+f0tybsGqENG9g5faLwg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
On 03/07/15 12:00, Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2015-07-03 9:26 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I am just thinking, that we should probably deprecate this
>>> functionality, because it usually brings only problems.
>> Deprecating save()?!
> I was thinking about implementing something more simple to save
> simulations. For example, only bodies, velocities and maybe interactions.
> Thus it could be more portable. AFAIK such a scheme is in LAMMPS.
Why not but it will not replace the current save() for resuming
simulations as if they were not interrupted.
Without proper engines, a list of bodies and interactions is useless.
B
Follow ups
References